Alternative high school to add daycare for students

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Roughly a year after it opened its doors for at-risk students in the Mountain Home area, a local alternative school is expected to provide new services for some of those teens.

Addressing the needs of teenage parents enrolled in its classes, the school will add a daycare facility there early this year.

Fundraisers by the students and donations from private individuals and businesses have covered all the costs of the facility. No school district funds were used in its construction. Local social sororities and dairies have helped fix the facility up and provided supplies.

Located in the basement of the current school building on East Jackson Street, the daycare will feature an infant playroom with the a second, adjacent room set up as a designated sleeping area.

The facility was already in demand when the school opened last January, according to Mary Kaye Johnson, who serves as the school's counselor.

"When the doors opened here... there were already teen moms coming to the school," Johnson said.

In fact, the school currently has 10 teenage parents with three more expected to start classes at Bennett Mountain this month. In many cases, she said, those teen parents had dropped out of school because they missed too many days of class since they couldn't find reliable daycare.

Juana Gonzales is among these students. A mother of two children that was also working to make ends meet, she struggled to finish just one year of high school. Despite maintaining top grades in school, the demands at home prompted her to stop going to school three years ago.

Gonzales, like other teen moms, come from families where their parents work. Many times, they don't have grandparents or other family members that could care for their children.

According to Johnson, those enrolled at Bennett Mountain were given a great opportunity and a second chance to finish their education. The learning environment there also gives them a little flexibility to deal with family issues associated with being a parent.

However, the school faculty knew these teens would end up "back at square one" unless they had a dedicated daycare they could afford, Johnson said.

"How great would it be for moms to come to school knowing their children are right there being taken care of on a day-to-day basis? They can focus on their studies and their goals, and we can take one of the stresses out of their lives," Johnson said.

As part of their agreement with the school, the students will be required to visit with their children at lunch, which has its advantages, according to Johnson.

"They get to see their child during the day and don't have to wait for six to eight hours to pass before they get to see them," Johnson said. "They really like that."

"I want our own facility," Gonzales said. "I can go downstairs and make sure they're OK, see if they're fussy. We can get some time together."

In addition, the daycare program will offer the school an opportunity to provide a parenting program for the students. "They can actually earn credits for that," said Bennett Mountain's lead instructor, Stehvn Tesar, who noted that nearly a quarter of the students at the alternative school have children.

"This isn't something where they drop their kids off at one end of the building and go be a teenager the rest of the day. They have to take care of them, feed them, it's a family environment," said school board chairman Jim Alexander.

Efforts to open the facility at Bennett Mountain started earlier this year when the teachers and staff visited Canyon Springs High School in Caldwell. The alternative school has a daycare for the students enrolled there.

"When we took a look at it, we were taken back," Johnson said. "It was just like any other daycare setting... in the community."

It prompted the Bennett Mountain staff to move forward with a similar plan. Last May, Tesar briefed the school board here on that alternative school's progress to date. He included a recommendation to build the on-site daycare facility.

Originally hoping to open the daycare in January, school officials currently expect to open its doors by March.

It's something teens at the school were already discussing when the new school year began, according to Johnson.

"When the moms found out about this daycare program possibly being made available at Bennett Mountain, you could just see the relief on their faces," she said.

These parents know their children will be at the school every day, which takes away a portion of the stress associated with being a teen parent, Johnson added.

The school has relied on fundraisers and public donations to renovate a basement area into a licensed daycare facility. Meanwhile, the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare will cover a bulk of the day-to-day operating costs.

Moms using the daycare will sign up for a child care co-payment service through the Department of Health and Welfare. That qualifies those teens to pay for the infant care on a sliding scale system based on their income. It's the same one low-income families throughout Idaho can use to have the state subsidize a portion of regular daycare costs. On that scale, since the students usually earn less than $1,629 a month outside of classes, they'll pay $40 per child with the state covering the remaining $550 that represents the market rate for private daycares in the region.

The program hasn't been universally praised. Some local daycare operators, including some within two blocks of Bennett High School (the old Hacker annex building), have complained that the district is taking away some of their business by running its own daycare for the Bennett students. The district argues that its ability to offer parenting programs for the students with its "in house" daycare is a benefit that can't be matched.

"Part of our job," Alexander said, "is to produce productive citizens. This helps get kids back into school and it gives them life skills. Otherwise, they'd probably wind up just sitting at home living off welfare. Without these kinds of programs, you can't beat that welfare cycle. Schools like this, with programs like this, can prevent that cycle from continuing.

"They graduate, go out and get good jobs and become productive members of society," he said.

Gonzales is one example of what the school can do, and agrees with Alexander.

"Before, I didn't even think it was possible to graduate from high school," she said. "Now, I plan on going to college and getting a major in education and a minor in business and criminal justice. They've shown me the benefits of a college degree. Hard work pays off. Around here we say, 'after the storm comes the rainbow'. Never give up."

Officials at the school recently opened an account at Idaho Independent Bank specifically to cover the renovations costs for the new daycare. Donations to the Bennett Mountain High School effort are tax deductible.

For more information, call the school at 587-3837.

Comments
View 23 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • It's unfornate that such young people should have these kinds of worries. It's not a perfect world or a perfect situation. But finishing HighSchool is so important and it's really good to see the community and school doing something to help these young people have a better chance at life.

    -- Posted by ktlm on Wed, Jan 8, 2014, at 11:04 AM
  • So do we not understand that if you have unprotected sex that a baby can result from that? It is VERY unfortunate that sex is much like a sport around here. Maybe there needs to be more education on what happens as a result of unprotected sex and the costs associated with raising those children for the next 22-25 years (over 300K to get a child to 18).

    Schools should be in the business of education---NOT daycare. So say the teachers anyway.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Wed, Jan 8, 2014, at 3:08 PM
  • OM,

    There is no excuse for unprotected sex. As I said "it's not a perfect situation". This is not a regular school, this is a school for those who have different needs. Sometimes things happen, and that's too bad. Everyone makes stupid/dumb decisions, but sometimes that weak moment changes a person life FOREVER. I'm sure you've never regretted anything you've done.

    To find a way to help a young person out at finishing school so they can live up to their new responsibilites will never be a wrong. Key work being HELP. For a teenage girl to get herself through school with passing grades while having an infant and while probably working is a lot.

    If she gets through that she will probably be a great contributor of society.

    Enstead of putting people down for their past mistakes, help them to rise up.

    -- Posted by ktlm on Thu, Jan 9, 2014, at 10:17 AM
  • The bottom line is that as usual, the public is being lied to and fooled by the school district dictatorship. Shame on the school board member who is a private business owner himself. Don't be fooled, this school daycare will eventually prove to be some sort of self serving act for a group of people. It will come out in the future, as did all they lies about the bonds when the supposed High School/ Junior High School was being built all those years ago! This administration must really think the public is just a bunch of non educated low life folks who will believe just about anything!

    There are currently no high school kids sitting at home unable to attend school because they have a baby with no where to take him/her. Yes there are girls at the school with babies, and all of their babies are currently at some sort of daycare or location where they are being cared for while their mom is at school. So how is this daycare inside the school going to benefit girls and allow them to do anything more than they are already doing. This same sliding fee scale that the school district is bragging about is also available at any of the daycare facilities in town. These girls are not going to pay a penny less than what they would pay at those daycares. It is a state program, not something the school district is offering exclusively. Welcome to the real world girls, we have babies and we have to work and go to school and lots of other responsibilities. We would all love to be with our babies during the day, run downstairs from our jobs to hold them, feed them, change them, but that is not the case. I think that would be more of a distraction to the young mother than anything. Aren't they supposed to be focusing on their education and graduating? Also, what type of message are we sending to junior high girls and even middle school girls? Don't worry if you get pregnant, you can take your baby to school with you! How fun and exciting! We can all read about it on facebook too! Somewhere the school district has lost their grip on just what their job is supposed to be...... EDUCATING the children of our future. Leave the daycare to the private businesses who specialize in JUST DAYCARE. Maybe next the school district can figure out a way to put a pharmacy into the schools so when all these babies get sick, the moms can just walk to the school pharmacy and get their medicine, because we all know that apparently these girls have no way to go anywhere else such as a daycare, so they probably can't get themselves to the drug stores in town either! You can laugh but it makes just about as much sense!

    -- Posted by NotInTheClick on Thu, Jan 9, 2014, at 11:43 AM
  • The child care co-payment service through the Department of Health and Welfare can also be applied to one of the many private daycare buisnesses in town (including the 3 that are within one block of the school). So why cant the students children attend a private daycare AND use the child care co-payment benefit? 550 dollars a month from the state times 13 kids comes out to 7150.00 dollars being taken away from private buisness. Doesnt seem to be all that beneficial for EVERYONE

    -- Posted by bloodyknuckles on Thu, Jan 9, 2014, at 2:32 PM
  • After reading numerous comments concerning the daycare opening in the school, I will say that it is unfortunate what has taken place. But with that being said, these so called student-parents knew what could happen when they had sex. Bottom line. They wanted to be like adults, so why is it that we are not treating them like adults. There are numerous daycares in this town that offer the same sliding scale payment system just as the school has talked about. All the school board has done is take away from the local businesses during a weak economy. It is also my understanding that a couple of these students have their children in some of these daycares already. So with this new daycare all the school board has done is take money from them. People had also said that this new program will create jobs, maybe so. But what about the jobs that will be lost because of them removing their children from an established daycare and taking them to school. Bottom line is we are rewarding these kids for making foolish childish decisions. Make them accountable. Let them learn from their mistakes. When I read this article a few things stood out to me. First was the comment made by Mary Johnson the school counselor. She stated that these kids could not find reliable daycare. As a daycare owner, I can tell you that NONE of these student-parents came into my daycare center. So for them to say they could not find reliable care is not accurate. The other amazing thing that stood out is that one of these students has two children. I would (and this is just me) that she would have figured out from the first time she had sexual relations with someone what could happen. We can't protect, provide, support everyone that gets into trouble or makes bad decisions. They want to act like adults, well then lets treat them like adults. Lastly how are we paying these providers? where is the money coming from? Who is paying for the fingerprinting? Who is paying the licensing fees? I can't see donations covering all these costs. I for one am opposed to this daycare and you can be sure I will be at the next school board meeting to express my disgust in there not well thought out decision.

    -- Posted by robinhood1 on Thu, Jan 9, 2014, at 4:17 PM
  • The school has relied on fundraisers and public donations to renovate a basement area into a licensed daycare facility. Meanwhile, the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare will cover a bulk of the day-to-day operating costs.

    1. Who covers the "bulk" not covered by what H & W (ie the taxpayer's do not cover) from a school district that is "BROKE?"

    Fundraisers by the students and donations from private individuals and businesses have covered all the costs of the facility.

    2. If all funds have been raised through donations---then why is there a bank account set up for more/further donations?

    Moms using the daycare will sign up for a child care co-payment service through the Department of Health and Welfare. That qualifies those teens to pay for the infant care on a sliding scale system based on their income. It's the same one low-income families throughout Idaho can use to have the state subsidize a portion of regular daycare costs. On that scale, since the students usually earn less than $1,629 a month outside of classes, they'll pay $40 per child with the state covering the remaining $550 that represents the market rate for private daycares in the region.

    3. It would stand to reason that if the school can get this money for watching these kids of the students that the same program would be available for mothers to go to school and use PRIVATE DAYCARE for while they are in school. As a matter of fact, that is what the article says. So PRIVATE DAYCARE in this community does stand to lose business. So there are other reasons why these people do not go to school.

    More MHSD lies. This stands to cost the people of this community a BUNDLE. Wait for the first allegations of discrimination, mistreatment, etc. Imagine those insurance costs and liability. This district can't even educate kids for goodness sakes. Maybe we need to fix that broken part first and then work on daycare. Funny how none of this pregnancy stuff was brought up during the levy. The main reason stated for drop out was the "disconnect students felt in the 9th grade because they were at the Jr. High and not the high school." So which is it?

    Tell me lies tell me sweet little lies.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Thu, Jan 9, 2014, at 6:43 PM
  • Junkyard dog, you must be "In The Click" you seem to be brainwashed. That's nothing new for this town. I live on the same planet you do, I just don't wear a blindfold and ignore it when something is not right. You will not convince anyone that there are teenage mothers sitting at home, who have had to drop out of school because there isn't a daycare inside their building. That is just not anywhere close to the truth. It's a completely unnecessary convenience at the taxpayers cost. It might not have cost the taxpayers a penny this month,(and don't be fooled just because that's what they are claiming doesn't mean it's true) but how are they going to keep it running in the future? There are salaries to be paid, unless people are donating their time to care for these infants, there are many costs involved in running a daycare, and it is just not right nor needed in this school district. It's good to see that there are some people out there who can truly see what is going on. As daycare owners we can't fight it, but Karma is a wonderful thing and it does come back around. Funny though there is a very successful alternative school in this town who seem to be meeting certain 'roadblocks' that the school district didn't run into with their little secret plans..... It seems that a charter public GRADE school is not what the MHSD would like to see happen, and with good reason, sensible people will move their children and where will MHSD be then? The public needs to be made aware of what is going on in this town, instead of being told about it after it's a done deal. What's wrong MHSD? You don't believe in a little competition? How ironic of you. Only in a dictatorship do things like this happen. But what would I know, apparently I am not from this planet!

    -- Posted by NotInTheClick on Fri, Jan 10, 2014, at 8:02 AM
  • WOW!!! The district has a $2.7 million short fall and is spending its resources to open a daycare. With one hand asking taxpayers for more money, and with the other taking money from private business by going into competition with them. To top it all, the licensed daycare providers (through taxes) are paying their competitions salaries, insurance, and over head. All the while the district is asking that they operate for two more years with increased overhead. (The emergency levy being extended and property taxes not going back down). Is this not some sort of anti-trust infringement?? Can't wait to see what's next, it will make some great material for Jay Leno on the Tonight Show.

    -- Posted by dudewheresmycar on Fri, Jan 10, 2014, at 8:17 AM
  • *

    My favorite quote....

    "They get to see their child during the day and don't have to wait for six to eight hours to pass before they get to see them," Johnson said. "They really like that."

    This is nice but I really don't care, try being a military parent that doesn't get to see your children BORN or for 3-12 months. What about working parents that work 8 hours or more.

    I guess I'm not politically correct enough to care about this quote. I guess I'm tired of taxpayers getting raped and special programs being developed to coddle people's poor choices in life. Enough is enough we need more PERSONAL RESPOSIABILITY PLEASE.

    -- Posted by Trouble2011 on Fri, Jan 10, 2014, at 9:21 AM
  • *

    I sure hope all these "fathers" are in jail if the girl was under age or are being held financially responsible for this.

    Wait I forgot there is not PERSONAL RESPONSIABILTIY ANYMORE.

    -- Posted by Trouble2011 on Fri, Jan 10, 2014, at 9:23 AM
  • The daycares in MH are lacking to say the least...I wouldn't have taken my kids to any of them. It would be nice to be in the same building as their children are to ensure they are being cared for properly. BUT....if you are in the unfortunate situation of trying to purchase a home in Elmore County as we are look out for very high taxes right now in part due to the levy from the school district among other things I'm sure. Its insane. I'm assuming most who voted for these levys are not homeowners. They couldn't be knowing what they will be paying now. Funny...the people who have no children are the ones who are the experts on parenting..always. They would have perfect children who don't have pre marital sex. Ever.

    -- Posted by mhg4316 on Fri, Jan 10, 2014, at 3:17 PM
  • Taxpayers already pay for these children to be watched. It comes from health and welfare paid for by the state. The district will be getting this money and paying the bills from our property tax money. We will now be paying twice. The tax payers MUST get to the polls. It is the only way "staus quo" can be changed. You won't hear much more about the levy and daycare. We are expected to forget. The district is counting on us not taking the time to vote. They have about 1600 or so friends and relatives that will vote. This has been enough in the past to pass. We MUST get to the polls.

    -- Posted by dudewheresmycar on Fri, Jan 10, 2014, at 3:22 PM
  • So, here we are. Looking at our city and school district again.

    Do we believe all we read, or do we look between the lines of what is being said?

    I, as tax-paying citizen and business owner of over 16 years, choose to read between the lines. Did you know that the MHHS did not enquire of any daycare in town whether this decision to open an "in house daycare," would affect local businesses? I can tell you all for a fact that they NEVER!! came into my daycare to see if it would affect me. Did you know that according to local data, collected by several of the daycare owners, that we have room for the 14 children looking for care in Mountain Home? Did you know, that I never saw a single one of these teenage parents at my daycare looking/inquiring about care for their children?

    Of course you didn't. Why, you ask? Because the Bennett Mountain School did NOT want you to know this. Neither did the MHHS want you to know. Why?, so we all ask? Because they did not want us as citizens and taxpayers to know that they had not done their homework before proposing that we fund a daycare for a total of what? 13 students... Did you know that this represents less than 1% OF THE TOTAL STUDENTS ENROLLED in the schools of Mountain Home? So, as citizens and taxpayers in the city of Mountain Home, why are we being asked to support this "In house, and needed daycare", in our city? I firmly believe that the City Council and the School Board, think that we can NOT look beyond the obvious.

    Why are we being asked to "Donate our time and resources" to a daycare that is NOT needed in our school system? It is the job of our educators to provide "EDUCATION," NOT daycare.

    There are over 8 established daycares in our community and over 15 private daycare's that CAN and DO, provide Quality care for families in Mountain Home. Many of us have worked for years to establish our reputation in Mountain Home. We have worked with countless families and children throughout the years. We have established a working reputation with the State of Idaho and ICCP to retain our licensing as providers in this town. We go through continual licensing requirements, training and inspections to keep our centers/employees up to state codes. We pay the fees required of us and attend the trainings also. Did the Bennett Mountain HS pay these fees? NO!! They were excused the $100.00 fee by the Planning and Zoning commission and the City Board because the Board felt the need to let the fee go. I paid my fee when my business came before the board.

    Does any person in this town think we are making our fortune in daycare? If so I would suggest that you come in and really see what we do on a daily basis. We do our jobs/own our businesses because we love working with children.

    Some people on this forum have suggested that WE as citizens of Mountain Home, do NOT know what we are talking about when we are posting on this board. Have you really looked at all of the facts? I have. I know that I have paid additional taxes for the last 4 years. I know that I have NOT seen them used for what the City Counsel/School Board said they were for. I know that I am NOT willing to let the wool be pulled over my eyes by the city again. I do NOT believe that the POOR 13 single, teenage parents at Bennett Mountain NEED a daycare in our school district. In fact, I know that they do NOT need this daycare. How you ask? Because, there are 8-23 Qualified Daycare providers in our city ready, willing and eager to provide these teen "parents" with quality, timely and affordable daycare.

    Look at the BIG picture citizens of Mountain Home, and you will see that not everything is the way our Representative's want us to believe.

    I strongly suggest, that as tax paying citizens, you make the time to attend the next City Council Meeting and the next School Board meeting this month. I plan to be there, with all of the data I can compile. We can and should let our opinions and voices be heard. We elected these officials. We have the RIGHT to let them understand and know how we feel before they make decisions that will affect us and our community for years to come.

    I challenge you, citizens if Mountain Home, to come forward and let your opinions be heard. Let's let the City Council of Mountain Home know that we are watching what they are doing, and we are NOT afraid to voice our opinions...

    -- Posted by diva1 on Fri, Jan 10, 2014, at 10:51 PM
  • Just curious MGH. Did you read your post on this forum. It is definitely a contrast of opinions. First you wouldn't take your child to a daycare in this town, but you do not understand the taxes being levied on the home/business owners? You seem to be conflicted. I have paid the taxes for the last 4 years as both a Home owner and a business owner in this town. I know how much I have paid out to the city.

    You criticize the daycares, but did you look at all of them? If you did. What was wrong with them. You never did say? As a business owner and a home owner, I believe that you need to specify your concerns and needs of our daycare's/city council. Please let us know how we failed to meet your needs as daycare's in this town and we will TRY to meet them. As a daycare provider, we try to address the concerns of all parents/potential parents. Please let us know where we failed to meet your expectations and I can assure you that we will try to meet them.

    Concerned daycare provider....

    -- Posted by diva1 on Fri, Jan 10, 2014, at 11:50 PM
  • A question for the "status quo". Why did the district create BMMHS?? If we go back and read the old articles, the answer appears to be CASH flow for the district. They found a way to get more money from the state pure and simple by opening a "charter school" and shifting some students. It is always about finding more money.

    Could it be that this new BMHS is not the money maker they thought it would be? Is there a possibility they need the +- $7,000.00 per month to make ends meet?? I have never heard any discussion in a public forum on how the district wanted to make any program better for the students, whether it be drama, choir, band, football, basketball, debate etc... All we hear is cuts might be made to them due to $$$. Why can't the young mothers attend MHHS? Put a daycare in over there, and all problems solved for a lot less money. But wait, the district won't be getting the extra money from the state.

    To the average tax payer none of this makes any sense. But the district it makes total CENTS.

    -- Posted by dudewheresmycar on Sat, Jan 11, 2014, at 8:59 AM
  • JYD you mentioned that you were a teacher, as in the past tense, and I just want to say that I for one am very glad that you are not a teacher in the present. I have kids in this school district, and I would not appreciate them having you as their teacher. That being said, I do not think that any of us are trying to prevent any student from receiving their high school education. In fact, with the School District doing this, they are the ones who are impeding just that. I don't remember my high school education including any such nonsense as what this administration is proposing. If there are in fact kids who have dropped out of high school it is not because they have nowhere for their babies to go. Again, we have given many examples of different ways that a single mom can finish her degree. FREE ways, as well. So you are going to have to come up with some other argument if you are going to convince tax payers that this is a necessary thing. On a side note, does anyone know if the school district will have to purchase baby car seats for the school busses next? I mean, alot of high school students take the bus to school, so wouldn't they have to make room for all the babies that go to school with their moms now too? Oh, and how about all the new high chairs they will need for the lunchroom? Don't forget the expensive baby changing stations that will need to be installed in the bathrooms as well.... having babies at school entails alot more than just a couple cribs people, the costs could skyrocket as the amount of babies increase. Just remember, "If you build it, they will come...." all it takes is money, yes, taxpayer money!!!

    -- Posted by NotInTheClick on Tue, Jan 14, 2014, at 7:52 AM
  • It is a sad day when MHSD competes for dollars with local business, but are we missing the big picture? BMHS was created to generate more dollars for the district. I think we all know that. Did creating a charter school generate any more revenue for the district? Or did it create even more liabilities? This daycare is being created to generate more dollars for the district. They see more dollars available from the state just as they did when BMHS was formed. Its all about more money from the state. Will this daycare generate more revenue for the district? Or will it create more liabilities? My guess is more liabilities. The district can spread its overhead over 12-15 children at this point. The income is not that bad, and it will probably make some money at this time. What happens if the number of children drops to 1 or 2? Now this over head is spread over 1-2 children. Now the district starts to lose a lot of money. The daycare will close, and the district will just go back to asking tax payers for more and more money.

    -- Posted by dudewheresmycar on Tue, Jan 14, 2014, at 12:20 PM
  • I see that the great people of Mountain Home are providing great response to this daycare issue. I ask my fellow tax payers, please join us on the 21st of this month for the school board meeting and then again on the 10th of Feb for the city council meeting...as we "some of the local daycares" will be expressing serious concerns about this daycare...Thank you

    -- Posted by robinhood1 on Tue, Jan 14, 2014, at 12:47 PM
  • MGH makes a valid point about the daycare situation in Mtn Home as I experienced it; however I do concede my kids are now 19 and 16, past day care age. Well, most days anyway:)

    Anyway, I spent years working nights when my kids were little so that we wouldn't have to do the day care thing. It was only an issue when my husband had a long TDY or deployment, and I remember the struggle to find a place that the kids liked going to, I felt comfortable with, and was affordable. A lot of places didn't offer a part time rate for my older daughter who was past kindergarten, and I was able to get her to school before going to work so I only needed after school care for her, unless it was summer of course. Then there was the cleanliness. I remember looking at 4 or 5 places one day, and feeling ickier each time. The cleanest place I saw that day? No part time rate. So I would always have to settle for something I wasn't quite happy with. I will say that when I finally did find day care I was happy with, it was the Kid's World facility that used to be on Airbase Rd. I have a lot of respect for the lady that used to own it, she was really good.

    Anyway, I can relate to these young moms maybe not feeling good about leaving their children somewhere, or just wanting to be closer to them. It IS hard leaving your kids with somebody else. Even though these girls are NOT in an ideal situation, that is the situation, and it benefits nobody if they don't finish high school. If the daycare doesn't work out, they can scrap it.

    -- Posted by DANSHL on Tue, Jan 14, 2014, at 8:49 PM
  • JYD just an FYI Kindergarten in Idaho is not even mandatory, so I seriously doubt that the state is going to force preschool onto the Idaho School District, of which only one is not in the RED..... and another point to ponder, of the few public schools who do offer preschool to special needs children, paid for by the tax payers, that school does not last the parent's entire workday. The school buses actually transport these children to and from the daycare centers in town now. I can guarantee you that not a one of us daycare owners are feeling threatened by this legislation you claim that is in proposal right now. Maybe we should stick to the issue at hand. Thank you for downgrading our profession to 'babysiting' some of us have college degrees, even teaching certificates, as well as our employees, who spend their days and weeks caring for and loving other people's children while they are with us sometimes up to 12 hours a day. Most parents look at us and say "I could NEVER do what you guys do" and that says something. Are we ever going to be able to compete with the CDC out on base? No way, we aren't the government and we don't have unlimited funds with which to offer every luxury and amenity afforded to them. We run on the budget of what our parents' tuition is able to provide. None of us are getting rich, believe me! I will say that JYD your approval is not needed, our parents appreciate and understand what we do and by keeping their children in our centers from birth to 5th grade proves it over and over again. To the public, If a person is happy with paying your hard earned money into taxes that will be spent on a daycare facility for a handful of teenage moms and their babies, then don't do anything at all. If this angers you, then stand up and do something. Simple as that. Start by educating yourself on the situation, and then going to the school board meeting Jan 21st. We can't change things in this town by sitting back and watching it from the stands. If you pay taxes, you have a right to your opinion and a duty to stand up if you feel something is wrong.

    -- Posted by NotInTheClick on Wed, Jan 15, 2014, at 7:27 AM
  • Thanks "KTLM" I think you were one of the few words of reason.

    I should not be reading any of these posts, now I will go to the city council meeting and MHSD board meeting that I was not planning on attending. It is so stupid to see these business owners so upset about this daycare in the school. Do you think Boise daycare centers got together to bash Booth Memorial. I think not. And, I think that you are all misinformed. None of this is about you being inadequate like you seem to believe. It is about kids, who are not mature enough, yet already had children of their own, who need to be walked kindly into this big world. Why are you all fighting so hard against this. If you didn't own a daycare center... you wouldn't care. That says a lot, if you are a thoughtful person.

    I feel sorry for these kids who have kids. Luckily I was not a teen parent, I was a single mother at a very early age without parents and had to make due on my own. So, while I don't completely understand, I can empathize with a teen parent and how difficult it must be for them to leave the one person in the world that loves them unconditionally (a reason many kids get pregnant), their child, with just any daycare available. It has nothing to do with your ability as a daycare owner, and everything to do with the maturity of these teen parents to be able to separate themselves from their children. You taking it personally makes me wonder what keeps you up at night, what have you done so wrong that you feel you have to "stand up against" the daycare in a school.

    Mountain Home School District could not pay me enough money to say anything good about them. In fact, before I read your comments I would not of had much good to say at all about the teachers they choose to allow a full retirement, the principles they allow to maintain a job because of "tenure" and not because of their performance or kind attitude. I am sure, that if Jim Alexander saw that comment he laughed himself into a great mood. I can't stand this school district. They are behind in the times, they laughed me out of the office when I suggested a "bully seminar" only to watch Boise, Nampa and Caldwell have several successful such seminars. This School District is out of date, and slow to learn or care. However, it is not the school boards fault, they can only do so much. And, coming from me, that is a huge transition from my attitude 7 years ago. It is our fault as a nation. Education reform should be a priority, and we are not demanding that as voters. Don't get me wrong, we have some amazing teachers here.. equal and opposite reaction is so true, along with the best, come some of the worst, it would almost be better to just be mediocre instead of having such a difference of personalities. With all that said, one school came out and is trying to create a community with a higher rate of successful graduations and you all jump on this bandwagon about the daycare.

    Look at the WECRD. Seriously, it is a mess. If you want your taxes to go down, eliminate that and ask the YMCA to come in (they will not work with this district because they refuse the no child denied on inability to pay policy) You are not the only one who has done homework.

    Look at the Youth Center, Mayor Rist was awesome when he yanked funding because of shotty book work. Couldn't say how many soda's made it into the building and how many made it into the elusive "Bowman" household fridge. Unfortunately, he was hoping there was another alternative that didn't pan out. Mayor Rist was doing what was right for the kids of this community. They need to be moved out of the bar district and into the Stardust Plaza with a lit parking lot, bus drop off, and plenty of room for all the needs of the kids, not just a few of the needs by a couple of the kids.

    I know I am a bit off topic, we are talking about a daycare in a school. I just find it to stupid to argue about. I would be lowering the person I am to continue to say, until I'm blue in the face that this is needed, it is not an attack on the daycare centers or providers here.. it is to help these emotionally, mentally immature kids with their kids. I can't believe all the people with all the time to complain. Where were you when we were trying to get a better Youth Center. Where were you when the WECRD denied the ability to fund recreation for your children, and forgot to add the YMCA possibility to their next years budget because they didn't know what they were doing.

    You are sad and pathetic. I will see you at those meetings. There have been many issues in the past that could of used the communities help, where were you before this, where were you when this could of been solved with an already existing tax funded group.

    If the WECRD were to make sure all kids were able to afford sports, maybe we would have less teen parents, and those who become teen parents would be mature enough to leave their kids at an existing daycare.

    If the Youth Center was open every weekend, even on Sundays, kept the kids busy with chaperoned dances, over-night parties and constant entertainment, these kids wouldn't of got pregnant.

    If we taught safe sex instead of absinence perhaps we wouldn't have as many teen parents as we do. Where were you 14 years ago when I was listing to the kids each week and helping them get their ideas to the adults in charge who up till then hadn't listened. I tried so long ago to get activities for these kids, to keep them busy, to not overlook some of the smartest kids just because they had parents that were better drug addicts than parents... I wanted a better place for kids because I know that if these kids aren't being occupied with activities, they find their own. pregnancy is what happens with those self-found activities. We could of cut down the number of teen parents, we still can. Maybe some of you could re-focus your energy and start preventing teen parents with no support from home. Start keeping them busy with the money we already have.

    Quit taking all your frustrations out on teen-parent-students. Look at the money already set aside for children instead of your fear that someone else will get the state money that you are so mad the school will end up with instead of you.

    -- Posted by honestabe2 on Mon, Jan 20, 2014, at 3:22 PM
  • Once again Abe, you got it all wrong. I'm not going to keep stating the facts, we all know them. No one, NO ONE is against these teen moms, we are against the school district playing God as usual, and thinking its right for them to go into the daycare business. Oh, and what's the point of going to the School Board meeting tonight when this is NOT on the official Agenda, and so the public can rattle on for three measly minutes their opinion while the Board Members can day dream of whatever it is that they daydream about. We will be speaking to deaf ears because this is 'supposedly' a done deal. We shall see.......

    -- Posted by NotInTheClick on Tue, Jan 21, 2014, at 7:40 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: