School bond goes to voters Tuesday

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

The Mountain Home School District will ask voters Tuesday for the second time to approve its $37 million bond proposal to complete Phase II of the junior high.

Completion of Phase II will turn the junior high into a four-year high school by adding a 28-classroom two-story wing, two computer labs, a professional-technical building, a performance arts wing and a 3,000-seat gymnasium.

The $1.5 million needed to replace the existing roof at Lloyd Schiller Gymnasium is also included in the bond.

Registered voters can vote from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. at any of the schools in the district or at the Pine-Featherville Senior Center. Unregistered residents can register to vote at any polling site.

The bond must receive a super majority of 'yes' votes to pass. A super majority is approval from 2/3 of participating voters.

The proposal is similar to the $34.5 million bond the district asked for in September but has increased to cover the rise in construction costs.

The $34.5 million bond failed to get a super majority by 73 votes last September.

If passed, the completed high school will house ninth to 12th grade students; the current high school will become a junior high for seventh- and eight-grade students, and Hacker Middle School will hold fifth- and sixth-grade students.

The district believes the proposal will significantly improve the quality of education for students in the district.

"This is what we need. We're not building it because it's pretty and would be nice to have," Superintendent Tim McMurtrey said.

"The kids deserve a good school. That is what this is, a good building that is going to last," he said.

The additions will expand educational opportunities for students, make new technology available in classrooms and eliminate overcrowding at the high school, junior high and middle school.

The high school's professional-technical program, the term preferred over vo-tech classes, will have a building nearly double the size of its current building.

The increased size will increase the number of students who can take professional-technical classes, such as automotive and industrial mechanics, carpentry, video productions and editing, drafting classes, health occupations and professional applications.

With limited space, students are often turned away from these programs at present. More space would eliminate that from happening.

The school district feels those classes are important because they teach students skills to be successful out of high school.

"It's very important because not every kid wants to go to college," McMutrey said. "We try to provide a well-orientated education."

Auto mechanics instructor Lynn Knudson is quick to point out students that do go to college or other post-secondary schools can use skills learned from the professional-technical program to work while in school.

He feels professional-technical programs not only help students stay in school, but also keep them focused in other classes.

"Student's aren't just interested in government and English, but they will take these classes and pass them if they know they need to take advanced classes," Knudson said.

With more space, and additional teachers, students would be able to maximize their experience in the professional-technical programs. Not only would more students be able to enroll in the classes, they would learn more in class.

Knudson said the increased space would give his students more opportunity to do more live work since his biggest challenge is finding enough room to set up equipment and demo procedures before students can work on their own.

Because of the space limitation, his Auto 1 and 2 classes are limited in the amount of live work they can do.

The increased professional-technical program opportunity would be available to ninth graders who currently are limited in the electives they can take since they are in a separate building.

The district feels that isn't the only advantage of housing ninth- to 12th-grade students together.

High school principal Jeff Johnson thinks it would help reduce the number of students who drop out between ninth and 10th grade and students would be more likely to understand they are working towards graduation credits.

Ninth-grade teachers would be able to teach more classes since the junior high only offers six courses a semester while the high school offers eight. That further expands the number of classes available to students.

The addition of the performance arts wing also increases the number of classes available to students.

The wing will consist of a 500-seat auditorium, band and choir classrooms, a few individual practice rooms and a classroom built directly behind the stage for the drama program.

"It's long overdue that students in performing arts have a place of their own," said Taunya Page, the high school drama teacher.

Because band and choir would have their own classrooms, each teacher could teach a full day's worth of classes instead of sharing a room with each other as they currently do.

The drama program would benefit from being able to practice on a stage without having to compete with a PE class or athletic team practicing at the same time.

Drama students would be able to focus more on the technical aspects of a show, such as lighting and sound.

When not being used as a teaching station, the auditorium could be used for community events, such as presentations like Rachel's Challenge or performances like Idaho Ballet. Both of those events occurred in the high school gym in the last two months.

The gym is another teaching station that would improve under the proposed plan.

In addition to the main court, the gym will have two courts in the mezzanie, the upper deck.

Mountain Home High School athletic director Jim Clark said the main court would most likely have the capacity to be split in half. Combined with the current junior high gym, the new high school would have four gyms and five courts.

Johnson said with the additional courts and the included weight room, up to four PE classes could occur at once instead of the two that can currently take place.

The additional gyms would make scheduling practice time for the school's athletic teams easier, specifically for the basketball teams.

The high school has a varsity, junior varsity, sophomore and two freshmen teams for boys and girls.

To accommodate the 10 teams during the season, practice is often scheduled until 8:30 p.m. Teams are sometimes sent to practice at Hacker Middle School, which has four teams of its own, or the sophomore team shares the court at the junior high with the freshman team.

Clark said scheduling teams for practice becomes more complicated when there is a home basketball game or wrestling meet. The wrestling team uses the school's only regulation size court to hold its meets.

The wrestling team will have its own practice room big enough to hold two mats on the same level as the gym floor. That will prevent student athletes from having to carry mats up and down stairs for home meets. It also gives the successful program the space it needs for its growing numbers.

The improved facilities will allow the school to hold district wrestling meets and basketball tournaments.

Clark said the current gym does not have the ability to hold district meets and he has had to turn down holding the events because there isn't enough seating in the gym.

The new gym will have enough seating to host major tournaments as well as indoor graduation ceremonies. Planned indoor ceremonies would eliminate the element of chance instead of allowing the weather to dictate if the ceremonies are held indoors or outdoors.

The bond will help overcrowding at Hacker. Currently there are 899 students in a building with a maximum capacity of 926. In August, 946 students are expected to show up on the first day of school.

Reducing the number of students in the building by a grade will reduce the wear and tear on the building and decrease the amount of traffic associated with the school.

To finance the completion of the building, the school district is seeking the approval of a $37 million bond over 20 years. The new debt would be added to the existing debt from the 1995 bond that built the junior high.

The bond will have a levy rate of .00175 or $1.75 per $1,000 of taxable assessed value of property in the school district.

If passed, the levy rate will be added to the levy rate of the existing bond until 2015 when the first bond is paid off. The levy rate will remain the same in 2015 and the full amount collected will go towards the new bond.

Taxes on property with a taxable assessed net value of $100,000, would increase an additional $14.59 a month.

Net value is determined once the homeowner's exemption has been applied to the original assessment.

The homeowner's exemption is given to owner-occupied houses and for tax year 2007 was equal to less 50 percent of the value of the property, including up to one acre of land, or the maximum of $89,325. That means if the owner of the property occupies a $189,325 house on one acre, the owner would pay the same taxes for property valued at $100,000.

The assessed value within the school district was $1,005,064,817 for 2007. With the 0.00175 levy rate, the school district would have raised approximately $1.75 million in 2007, had the bond already been in place.

Because the assessed value within the school district increases yearly, the levy rate decreases slightly from year to year.

Rather than pass the bond in pieces, the school district is asking voters for the full amount of what it would cost to complete the project.

McMurtrey said building in phases would cost more since the cost will continue to rise with each new bond.

"We feel prudent to do it once. It's better for taxpayers to do it this way," McMurtrey said.

The current junior high was built in 1998 with the plan to expand it into a high school within a few years. Enrollment rates in the district declined, causing the school bond to delay pursuing the bond until September.

Comments
View 34 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I for one will be voting no on the school board. And I will vote no on every other bond. I just can't afford my taxes to go up once again. This is a small community which cannot afford all these bonds. Next bond coming around will be the hospital.

    Come on people, we don't have all this extra money laying around. Just look at where we are now, high gas prices, food prices are going up, power and heat bills increasing, but my wages are staying the same, no increase.

    Why is it that only homeowners have to bear the bonds. Since all the people use the schools, let's have everyone pay taxes. Lets increase the car tags in Elmore county, that way everyone gets in on paying for the schools, hospitals, and whatever next is coming our way.

    Both my children graduated from Mt. Home and have left to work and live in other states. One of my daughters is currently serving her country in Iraq.

    There are no jobs in Mt. Home that pay more than minimum wage, so all these kids who will have all this great education, leave Mt. Home for someplace else, and take their spending power with them. The only people left here are retired and people who just sleep in Mt. Home and work in Boise.

    -- Posted by Britgirl on Thu, Apr 24, 2008, at 11:10 AM
  • No vote here too and everybody I know and I know alot of people

    -- Posted by Freedom on Thu, Apr 24, 2008, at 12:46 PM
  • I will vote yes for the bond even thought I don't have kids in school any more. You forget without an education the kids of Mountain home cannot go to other states and compete for other jobs also without education thier will be more people on state aid and welfare which by the way your taxes pay for Britgirl

    -- Posted by drd1 on Thu, Apr 24, 2008, at 3:15 PM
  • Wow Britgril - what a post! No jobs that pay over minimum wage?? You better look around there are several jobs that pay over minimum wage. I will be voting YES for this bond and I hope that many more people will as well. It's not just for the kids, it's for EVERYONE in the community. I have a child that will never get the opportunity to use the facility, but perhaps maybe someday my grandkids will.

    -- Posted by mtnhomemom1 on Thu, Apr 24, 2008, at 3:31 PM
  • I am also a yes vote. The people voting no have not given a good reason for it. They are thinking of only now not the future, they say it is to much money to spend. My thought is I would rather pay this now then have the cost double in a few years and my taxes go even higher. If we build now and more people move there tax dollars will also go to the paying off of the bond that way it gets paid off sooner, meaning we paid less interest on it. If we wait and the people move here the pice will go up to build it and our taxes are still going to go up. I would rather pay now and have what we need than wait a few years and pay more.

    -- Posted by small town on Thu, Apr 24, 2008, at 5:09 PM
  • I'm with small town and drd1 on this one...Yes!!! And all the people I know also...and I know a lot of people also Freedom.

    -- Posted by g4kdz on Thu, Apr 24, 2008, at 8:48 PM
  • I also know a lot of people that would have voted yes last time but didn't. I'll make sure they get out to vote this time.

    -- Posted by mule on Thu, Apr 24, 2008, at 10:44 PM
  • I, of course, will be voting YES. The future is cheaper now, and those who say they don't have extra money laying around... better vote yes now before we need to start digging for even more money in the near future. It only gets more expensive, AND THE CHANGED NEED TO BE MADE. Make the investment now, and we'll benefit for years to come. VOTE YES AND SUPPORT EDUCATION AND OUR COMMUNITY.

    -- Posted by bond_supporter on Thu, Apr 24, 2008, at 11:44 PM
  • I know where's the Money at and I know how to get it and who to get it from, and everyelse does too. We don't need to Rake the Property Owner. this Idea of "if don't pay now it will cost more later" if thats the Major Plan of the Government thats not a problem. its not that we don't have money, as a State we're are just not will too go get it.

    This Plan of Bonds will expose the taxpayer to excessive Risk. this bond if its a bond with interest could cost the property owner this is just my opinion, with the care and maintance for the building and shops this could cost the property owner well over a 100 million dollars plus, then whats next, what other bond will come along to build more on the school too fix problems, we're on a Ride folks

    -- Posted by Freedom on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 5:29 AM
  • Folks as a Community we should NOT ignore almost 2.5 tillion dollar Economic Loss and thats what we are doing with Idaho Laws.

    this kind of Big Cash can make talk real cheap real fast.

    this whole story line of the Govenment "we don't have money" just don't fly, what we are supporting is not Education but the Governments Political Philosophy, they are stuck in their Political Box and can't get out and we Property owners are paying for it

    -- Posted by Freedom on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 5:45 AM
  • Our Idaho Government is doing a good Job, sure they are running the state of Idaho into the Ground. Our Idaho Government is selling us out Real Cheap to everybody But Idaho tax payer and property Owners, don't people thinks its odd, where all these McManison popping up over the years, did you ever think who are these people where did they come from. but most of all ,will they respect You Idaho citzen with their big west coast Money and the answer to that question is No they won't, so Idaho you better start standing on your feet and stop sitting on your brains before its too late and control this Marijuana Money that flowing out of our state, this playing cops and robbers with Marijuana is over, its now about the money and we as a people need too hire somebody who knows how to handle this type of big cash, and I did say cash did I not

    -- Posted by Freedom on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 6:02 AM
  • better vote yes now before we need to start digging for even more money in the near future. It only gets more expensive,

    don't have too dig into other peoples Money, they are more than happy too pay for education, anytime you want it. please don't tag us wrong, we're not against Education and we don't hate kids and we are concern about their future and well being.

    we just disagree about Where's the Money located. whos got it and how do we get it back and control it better,

    -- Posted by Freedom on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 6:36 AM
  • We call that 'Regulation" not Prohibition

    -- Posted by Freedom on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 6:39 AM
  • I will be voting no on the upcoming bond. Not because I don't think that we need it, but because the school district has historically done such a very poor job of managing the money they have! Our schools could be in much better condition and equiped with appropriate items for the students if the current and past two administrations did (had done) a much better job of financial management. They have not been good stewards of the money entrusted to them.

    Sorry, but if they can't manage the money they currently have, then I can't support them getting more of my tax money to mismanage and misuse.

    -- Posted by Albert Clement on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 12:32 PM
  • Small town, we have answered and answered and answered your questions. You just don't like our answers -- as is your right of course.

    But we have answered enough. Let it go, sweetie. Just vote your conscience and let us vote ours.

    -- Posted by senior lady on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 3:11 PM
  • Very well stated Cool Runnings. They never have told us where all of the money has gone over the years.

    I call a "no" vote self-preservation. There needs to be new people in these offices with new, fresh ideas on what to do and where to spend the money and how to MANAGE the money. Our current admin. has not spent much time in an economics class or business class. Wake up folks!

    -- Posted by Elmorehorselady on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 5:40 PM
  • Senior Lady

    I disagree questions haven't been answered just opinions have been given. The anti want it downsized but don't know how, the pro think it is fine the way it is. We both read the facts different, anti see no growth, pro see growth in this town. I will vote yes and you will vote no in the long run the one thing we all have in common is we want what is best for this town, I guess we will see in the future who was right.

    -- Posted by small town on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 7:11 PM
  • Small town, you asked over and over again how we would cut it down. This was answered. Now, I mean this: let it go. You're getting yourself all upset.

    But you are absolutely right about one thing: only the future will tell. That's why none of us, pro or con, are taking it lightly, believe me.

    -- Posted by senior lady on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 8:09 PM
  • Senior Lady,

    You yourself have said many, many times that you didn't know what to cut out.

    Let it go sweetie.

    -- Posted by mule on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 11:01 PM
  • I know what too cut, all of it

    -- Posted by Freedom on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 11:20 PM
  • Mule:

    Keep the condescending remarks to yourself. What has she done to you? You are a jerk.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 11:44 PM
  • not only would I cut it all out, I'd fire a few people, no problem at all, none what so ever, out the door they go

    -- Posted by Freedom on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 11:57 PM
  • I wish I was Mayor, I'd fix this problem real fast,

    -- Posted by Freedom on Fri, Apr 25, 2008, at 11:59 PM
  • Senior Lady:

    Do you need a ride to the polls? I would be more than happy to come and get you.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Sat, Apr 26, 2008, at 12:03 AM
  • I think this bond should never happen in the first place, all its done is stress the community and waste tax payers money on an election

    -- Posted by Freedom on Sat, Apr 26, 2008, at 12:11 AM
  • I think I have said I don't know beyond cutting back the size of the auditorium and the gym -- certainly I don't know specifically how to cut the costs elsewhere except for materials that are still safe and durable. I'm not an architect to know all the details available.

    But those are answers and others have had similar ones.

    And we all need to rest.

    No, opinion missy, thanks but I won't need a ride.

    -- Posted by senior lady on Sat, Apr 26, 2008, at 6:51 AM
  • Enough is Enough.... This is a time to buckle down and manage the budget better. Why vote to put us more in debt. I VOTE NO!

    -- Posted by WABASH on Sun, Apr 27, 2008, at 2:14 PM
  • I VOTE NO !

    -- Posted by Freedom on Mon, Apr 28, 2008, at 9:58 AM
  • I VOTE YES!

    -- Posted by bond_supporter on Mon, Apr 28, 2008, at 12:32 PM
  • I will be voting No! on this School Bond, Reason being is well for one they say "overcrowding at the high school, junior high and middle school."...yeah that is due to the fact that all but one of the Base Schools have closed.

    So they had to ship all of the students from base to Town...if it wasn't for that fact, the High, Junior, and Middle Schools would not be "Crowded".

    small town posted "I am also a yes vote. The people voting no have not given a good reason for it." ummm....i got one...how about.......THE ECONOMY!.

    one more thing before i leave, "$34.5 million bond failed to get a super majority by 73 votes last September."...ok if 34 million didnt pass...what would make you think that 37 million will pass????

    "This is what we need. We're not building it because it's pretty and would be nice to have," Superintendent Tim McMurtrey said....that is exactly why they are trying to pass this Bond.....because it is pretty and it would be nice to have.

    -- Posted by bond_opposer on Mon, Apr 28, 2008, at 10:14 PM
  • Please don't forget too Vote.

    GOOD LUCK EVERYONE

    -- Posted by Freedom on Tue, Apr 29, 2008, at 8:50 AM
  • I just Voted "NO", this should be interesting too see the results, either way what a nice day it is today, have fun, its Great to live in the United States

    -- Posted by Freedom on Tue, Apr 29, 2008, at 10:48 AM
  • Good idea, make the kids (aka-our FUTURE) suffer because of the economy! When was the last time you stepped into a school? Have you seen how crowded the classrooms are? How over-worked the teachers are? How under-staffed the schools are? No, I'm not a teacher, but I do volunteer in my sons classrooms, so I see it all week after week!

    I would have hoped more people would be concerned about the education of those who will someday be leading our country! I guess you really can't teach an old dog new tricks! :(

    -- Posted by MommiezBoyz on Tue, Apr 29, 2008, at 7:56 PM
  • make the kids (aka-our FUTURE) suffer

    excuse me these kids are not suffering, where are they suffering, where, find one, you wanna know who's suffering , the tax payer, who have to pay for these suffering kids driving their SUVs to school. oh and the ones who do suffer, well the school don't want those kids, those are the ones sleeping on the street and in Jail, and this happens NOT because they don't have an Education, its because of CLASS.

    -- Posted by Freedom on Sun, May 4, 2008, at 6:20 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: