"Just Take it ALL! We Don't Mind!"

Posted Thursday, May 26, 2011, at 5:27 PM
Comments
View 47 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I have a question

    How much of our tax money goes toward foreign aide?

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Thu, May 26, 2011, at 5:34 PM
  • GOOD question.....have to check that out......GOOD post your right both sides LIE have and continue to do so.

    They will tell us about representative government.....yeah and ??????? HOW COME THEY ARE NOT LISENTNING ??????? i send them letters, call and they ignore so who are they representing????????????? THE FIRST ONE THAT PERSONALLY ANSWERS I WILL ROOT FOR........YES SIR BUDDY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    -- Posted by lamont on Thu, May 26, 2011, at 7:08 PM
  • Here's a 2010 federal tax receipt. Check it out its pretty interesting

    http://latestcelebrity.net/us-politics/a-taxpayer-receipt-calculate-exactly-wher...

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Thu, May 26, 2011, at 9:57 PM
  • Your statement about Obama giving 2 billion to Brazil for oil is another fake email that was sent around.

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Thu, May 26, 2011, at 10:04 PM
  • *

    Some more info on non-binding preliminary commitment to Petrobras can be found at the Export-Import website.

    http://www.exim.gov/pressrelease.cfm/1C3E8A59-FA74-F3CB-3F3E6E44E287C2DA/

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 6:59 AM
  • *

    Who do you suppose would've stepped in to provide a loan to Petrobras if the United States hadn't?

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 7:13 AM
  • -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 7:21 AM
  • That was something Glen Beck put out there and it isn't true.

    Bush had more to do with it then Obama did. But hey homer why should you care your an independent and never vote democratic. Which reminds me what Independent is going to run?

    Here's another link

    http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/bogus-brazilian-oil-claims/

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 8:32 AM
  • Well I can top all of this. Every news source reported on live TV that Obama had promised funds to Brazil. They report that on every visit a President makes and what dollar amount of AID has been pledged.

    That has been going on forever. If the President hasn't promised foreign AID, the Secretary of State does.

    So I guess we are all stupid and don't understand plain English? We know that each President promises foreign aid, no matter what party is in office. But the point is that we need to stop it and help ourselved get back on our feet before we can commit to any other country besides our own.

    Maybe all of us who comment on these blogs need to read our constitution carefully and come back another day with what we figured out.

    My Government Class in HS, had a great teacher. He told us that the Constitution has worked so sucessfully because of the astute authors who drafted it.

    They were true visionaries who were wise enough to forsee future problems due to the evil designs of men. Greed and power=hungry rulers existed back then very much the same as what is going on today.

    They did not intend for our representatives to make a living out of being elected for congress or any other office, but instead, viewed it as a

    type of service for a short period of time and then to go back to their own businesses and interests.

    When you know that the cookie jar is empty and there aren't even any crumbs, why pretend that we have plenty of cookies for all? Why put ourselves into deeper debt for a handful of crumbs that may or may not exist?

    The crux of the matter is we are broke and all of us need to acknowledge it and QUIT poking each other about whose party is at fault. Just demand that the people who we voted for represent our interests, not anyone elses, including their own.

    So is anyone up to the challenge of reading Our Constitution and coming back for another informed debate?

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 9:26 AM
  • *

    I've read the Constitution a few times and I've never seen anything that specifically mentions, or for that matter may be interpreted as, a desire for term limits.

    I'm not trying to pick a fight here, but there are those of us who wish to use the Constitution as it appears in its final form with no further concern for the "intent" of the framers.

    With that in mind, is there a specific question that you propose we debate?

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 10:05 AM
  • *

    Other than presidential term limits that is...

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 10:06 AM
  • No, we are already debating questions. A good debater does his research.

    How is the career politicians working out for you? It seems to me that they basically get into office just to run again and raise money.

    If we shook things up and let them know that we are not happy by our votes, it might be a little more different attitude about their job description.

    They obviously thought that the 2010 elections were a fluke.

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 10:10 AM
  • *

    My misunderstanding.

    When you asked if anyone was up to the challenge of reading the Constitution and coming back for an informed debate, I thought you meant we'd be debating a Constitutional question.

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 10:17 AM
  • Where does it say in our constitution health care is wrong? Where does it say in our constitution provide for illegal aliens is wrong?

    I just heard on the news last night that finally we are going after the employers of illegals. It's about time. You know Bush could of enforced it to!

    Fine the employers a big hefty fine and then they won't employ the illegals. If there's no jobs to come here to get then that should slow them down, don't you think?

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 10:33 AM
  • *

    MtnHomer,

    Amendment IX "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

    -

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 10:34 AM
  • I just read the Constitution on-line, if you google it there is some very good information.

    If we stop the illegals at the borders, then there aren't any illegals for employers to hire. If we ask for identification and proof of citizenship, then we know if they are elgible for benefits or hire.

    ID's get forged all the time. We used to have several employees who produced all the correct identification, only to find out that they were borrowing someone's number. You are required by law as employer to verify citizenship.

    Our borders have to be protected first and the exisiting laws enforced. Then you will see a huge decline in the numbers spilling over the borders.

    For pity sake, we can't feel sorry for those who are here illegally. It wouldn't be so bad except they are now demanding the same rights as citizens including healthcare, employee rights and education.

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 10:43 AM
  • www.foreignassistance.gov

    if you are curious about where our money is going and how much.

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 12:09 PM
  • *

    So, what do you suppose they meant by "general welfare"?

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 12:15 PM
  • *

    I dunno MtnHomer, sounds like alot of spinning to establish intent to me. How the heck does this guy know " The Ninth Amendment simply shows the true intention of the authors of the Constitution."?!

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 1:08 PM
  • *

    And you told me what "general welfare" didn't mean.

    What I asked was, "What do you suppose the meant by 'general welfare'?"

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 1:38 PM
  • We've been giving out foreign aid to countries since 1941 world war 11 Franklin Roosevelt was our President..... Oh my and he was a Republican who started foreign aid using our tax money

    To bad you weren't around to tell them it wasn't what our taxes were for.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 7:30 PM
  • hahaha no he was a Democrat..... I had Republican on my mind and talking and typing I put in Republican ...... At least I know your reading my comments. Sometimes I could use a proof reader lol!

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 8:14 PM
  • RIGHT NOW I AM IN NEED OF SOME QUITE.I DONT LIKE GOING BACK INTO THIS MODE. I AM NOT HERE FOR THE LIKES OF HOMMER AND I AM SICK OF PEOPLE LIKE HIM.I AVOID THEM,LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WASTE TIME WITH THEM.I live a very happy fulfilling life and when the likes of him come along they tend to INFECT good people in bad ways.THIS world of ours can be so rich and joyous,people carring about one another,sharing knowledge,heartache,and joy.IT IS MORE THAN ENOUGH TO NOURISH OUR ENRICHMENT.........and then we have HOMMER. SO right now i am in touch with some positive people and thats were i want to be.GOT SOME MUSIC I NEED TO PLAY.

    -- Posted by lamont on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 9:15 PM
  • hahaha I'm still laughing about my Republican remark what a goof ! I had heard that Michelle Bachmann was suppose to make an announcement in Iowa if she was in for the run and was trying to find something about the announcement, which I couldn't find at the moment so I read your comment zook and started typing when pat asked me something and thats when I made the goof.

    As it turns out she didn't make an appearance in Iowa and didn't make an announcement. That's all I can find. I was going to do an update on the Republican Candidates as they are announced or if there's any changes.

    Don't forget the next debate is coming up soon

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, May 27, 2011, at 9:32 PM
  • HOMMER EVERYTHING..... YOU LISTED IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU DO.I DO NOT START POST BY USING A DISPARGING REMARK,AND OR CALLING SOMEONE A NAME YOU DO,AND NOT JUST ME.

    HOMMER.....I AM NOT HATEFULL BUT YOU THINK I SHOULD ACCEPT YOUR REMARKS .LEARN HOW TO TALK TO PEOPLE WITHOUT THE INSULTS.YOU WANT TO INSULT????? save it for those gatherings were people will tolerate your insults.as for THE PRESIDENT AND HIS WIFE YOU CAN INSULT ALL YOU WANT IT JUST SHOWS WHAT YOU ARE.there are ways to voice your displeasure and then there are ways to voice your displeasure.

    I said it before and i will say it again YOU SIR ARE A COWARD TO THE IST DEGREE THAT IS WHY YOU CONTINOUSLY INSULT ANYONE WHO DOESNT AGREE.

    THERE are other people here that you do it to and the can speak for themselves. But YOU are NOT going TO DO IT TO ME.YOU had slowed it down for awhile but i guess you didnt get the response you wanted,in any event suit yourselve but everytime you do it to me i will GET IN YOUR SORRY, COWARDLY FACE.LIKE IT OR NOT !!!!!!!!!!! I KNOW WHAT YOU ARE AND SO DO OTHERS,THEY HAVE TOLD YOU..

    you see you started in the first post i ever made when i said i had a business you said .......what?PUSHING LAWNMOWERS OR WHATEVER. YOU DIDNT ASK WHAT KIND OF BUSINESS YOU MADE AND ASSUMPTION FOLLOWED BY A DISPARGING REMARK CONCERNING 1099'S AND 941'S REMEBER THAT HOMMER.??

    I DO PRETTY CLEARLY... and it has never stopped because I wouldnt back down then.YOU ARE WHAT YOU ARE HOMMER........TAKE YOUR ARROGANCE AND PLACE IT WERE YOU CAN PLAY WITH IT DAILY AND LEARN HOW TO TALK TO PEOPLE.

    -- Posted by lamont on Sat, May 28, 2011, at 11:24 AM
  • HOMMER HOMMER HOMMER........GO TO THE ARCHIVES

    IF you think that because a person does not subscribe to your political persuasion is justification for you to throw insults and to state you HATE them for it, your a SICK PERSON.YOU ARE A COWARD OTHERWISE YOU WOULD NOT RESORT TO THAT.

    YOU STATED.." YOU DESERVE MY IRE".....THATS BEEN SAID BEFORE........YOUR A MUSLIM WOMAN SO YOU DESERVED TO BE RAPED(BOSNIA)...YOUR A JEW YOU DESERVE TO DIE(germany)....YOUR AND AMERICAN YOU DESERVE TO BE BEHEADED (AL QUAIDA).....YOUR AND INDIAN YOU DESERVE TO BE MASSECURED(AMERICANS)

    THE ONLY ..IGNORANT PERSON HERE IS YOU !!!!!!! cast whatever, maybe you ought to go back and read again.

    MY FEEBLE BRAIN SAYS EVERY TIME YOU THROW AN UNPROVOKED INSULT AND NAME CALL I AM GOING TO BE IN YOUR FACE.

    DONT IMPLY BECAUSE IM BLACK I DEFEND THE PRESIDENT, I AM BLACK THATS NOT GOING TO CHANGE I DEFEND ANYTHING AND EVERYONE OUT OF FAIRNESS. I HAVE CRITCISED THE PRESIDENT BUT YOU IGNORE THAT BECAUSE I AM NOT THROWING DEMEANING INSULTS. TOUGH !!!!!!!!! TRYING TO STEREOTYPE ME WONT GET IT. I DONT FIT , YOU SHOULD HAVE FIGURED THAT OUT ALREADY. HERES ONE OF YOUR INSULTS BACK AT YOU.....WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT PEOPLE WOULDNT FIT ON THE HEAD OF A PIN......HOW'S THAT GRAB YOU????????

    Speaking of IMPUDENCE ARE YOU FEELING GUILTY OR SOMETHING??....THAT IS PROJECTION......WHAT A JOKE YOU ARE.......YOU SHOULD STOP .........

    I DIDNT INSULT BUSH, AND IM NOT GOING TO CHANGE NOW.YOUR MEALY MOUTH, I DIDNT DO ANYTHING DOESNT FLY!!!!!!!!! YOU WERE TOLD BY SOMEONE ELSE ON THE OTHER BLOG THE SAME THINGS SO DEAL WITH IT.......INTIMADATE, I DONT THINK SO..... IV NEVER RUN IN MY LIFE AND THE LIKES OF YOU WONT MAKE IT HAPPEN NOW...YOUR WEAK.....THAT IS WHY YOU NAME CALL......BY THE WAY ARE YOU A FRIEND OF VICE PRES CHANEY??????????? just wondering

    -- Posted by lamont on Sat, May 28, 2011, at 9:46 PM
  • Making a Mountain out of a Mole Hill

    President Obama used the auto pen legally, you see any President can authorize its use. He wouldn't of had to use it but Rand Paul delayed the signing and it was getting close to expire

    Here's something I found out. Read below

    The Bush Administration's Office of Legal Counsel stated in 2005 that using an autopen is, in fact, constitutional, but never let it be said that a chance to attack the president over something tiny simply to score political points was ever left on the table.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 8:57 AM
  • Well his administration says he did. lol ! Is this going to be another witch hunt like the birth certificate? Leave it to a Republican to waste time and not work on some other more important issue! Anything to disrupt real work so they can find something else to pin on Obama

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 9:54 AM
  • *

    Mtn Homer, It seems you troll the internet and cut and paste a post that is prominently placed elsewhere on the internet. I've taken a few extractions from some of your posts, the most recent being the post made here at 08:27 AM, and find that they are verbatim quotes from several other sources.

    You're not a poopy head. Your're a pitiful, phony, plastic, intellectual parrot.

    You're not smart enough to develop the question regarding the constitutionality of the use of the autopen to sign legislation.

    The point was thrown out there by Rep. Graves because he's sore the act passed.

    It would be interesting to hear from Rep's Simpson and Labrador. Simpson voted for the extension, Labrador against.

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 11:27 AM
  • Homer FYI only Obama signed it in 2010 without the autopen. So I am sure he has read it.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 11:38 AM
  • Your grasping at straws there Zook...Anything to get a jam at Obama and his administration.

    If you read my new blog it might get across to you that no matter what president was in office or who sat in the congress chairs the economy was on a downward spiral and Bush getting us into 2 wars didn't help us when we were already heading down.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 3:00 PM
  • Correction: Jab not Jam want to correct that before Homer boy comes along on one of his bored outings to correct me on that word...

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 3:15 PM
  • Come on zook you can do better then that. You know as well as I do Bush was not the mastermind for 911.

    Now I could be wrong but wasn't he looking for bin laden in the wrong place. What about those missle's of mass destruction?

    You know more about these things then I do, even if I read it on various web sites and hear things on the news... I don't watch Fox news so I wouldn't know anything they talk about..

    I did watch a peace on Sara Palin and Alaska the other night, but it wasn't on fox news. And guess what it wasn't anything negative they were saying about her

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 4:21 PM
  • Homer Homer I don't care if you found the info on Drudge or another planet...

    I guess your saying between 2010 -2011 the Patriot Act had been changed so Obama needed to read it again in 2011? Can you prove that he didn't read it? Or can you prove that its been changed?

    Oh and I don't have to try to make you look bad, you do that to yourself. There ain't any one on here that see's differently then what I see.

    Pea Head comes to mind but hey I wouldn't call you that ! lol !

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 6:07 PM
  • OMG ! I almost fell off my chair !! Homer I am proud of you........... For giving out a link to back up what your saying. Funny thing I had seen a similar report about the signing of the patriot act and the senators saying the Justice Department is abusing the law... I figured if it came from me, you all would think I was slamming Bush. I never cared for the patriot act but then I thought if it will help with finding terrorist in our country than it can't be to bad...

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 6:30 PM
  • homer your getting a little carried away. I'm super happy you didn't leave a comment on my blog. It would be even better if you would just go away and find some place else to leave your unimportant comments.

    Please don't pity me, I am a wonderful happy old lady and no one in all my years of living have felt pity for me and I hope they never do. There is no reason what so ever to pity me. I live a good life!

    Don't forget lamont and Dave left comments for you, maybe you want to answer them ?

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 6:40 PM
  • Yeah but homer maybe Boehner will work on the patriot act. Gotta give him some work to do

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 6:42 PM
  • Keep posting MtnHomer I like reading them and you have every right to express your opinion. We have so many problems in this country with this administration in office and things are even worse than when Bush was in office.We are headed for harder times I'm sure. Employment has to be addressed now and people put to work. Enough of this constant political drum beat from him, we need jobs and tax relief. We need lower gas prices,less government involvement, and more incentives for nuclear power. These windmills are a joke. They will never solve any energy problems. Keep it up MH.

    -- Posted by arsenal on Sun, May 29, 2011, at 8:30 PM
  • PATRIOT ACT DONE WITH HELP OF BOTH PARTYS....RIGHT.......BUT ITS OBAMAS FAULT.....HOW DOES THAT WORK????????????

    I PERSONALLY HATE THE THING IT IS FLAT OUT WRONG,IT SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN INSTATUTED PERIOD.

    IT CAME OUT OF HYSTERIA.....AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE AWAY WITH.with the same BIPARTISAN SUPPORT

    -- Posted by lamont on Mon, May 30, 2011, at 11:06 AM
  • Question time homer & ammo1 how should we take care of the NO jobs in Mountain Home? What do we need to do right here in our town to open up more jobs? Any idea's will be greatly appreciated.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, May 30, 2011, at 12:29 PM
  • Don't just blame Obama about signing the Patriot Act

    Congress both the house and the senate reauthorized it first and then Obama signed it....

    Probably Boehner would of had a heart attack if he said he wasn't going to sign it.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, May 30, 2011, at 12:32 PM
  • CATCH 22......PROBALLY THE INTELL COMMUNITY.......

    PUSHED HARD OR THEY HAVE SOMETHING THEY DONT WANT TO STOP.......my guess would be that we have some paperwork foul ups.ANYHOW IT'S DONE.........

    THE blame game alive and well...........

    WE allowed the town to be overbuilt and gluttened the housing market ,we refuse to allow any set industry to come here.THERE HAS TO BE SOMETHING HERE BESIDES FARMS,AND LABOR INTENSIVE WORK....

    Construction is OK BUT IT IS NOT THE END ALL.

    The base employes approx 500 civilians and that has been constant through the years,that is not enough and approx 1/2 of them live in boise.....

    BOISE business now target mtn home for housing repaires and maint.We dont support our locals the way we should and they dont cater to us the way they should (GREED) THEY WANT BOISE MONEY. WE WANT BOISE CHOICE. This is a two way adventure.

    MY band doesnt play here why???????? NO place to play,we only want one kind of music etc.WE had a major music festival we didnt support.....gone.WE had races we did the same too.we use to have a major softball tourney all these things generated revenue,WE LET THEM FAIL.THESE WERE NOT THINGS THAT WERE GOING TO CHANGE OUR QUANTNESS....FOOD FOR THOUGHT.........

    WE have done the same thing about jobs......we dont have any of consequence.IT cost more to live but we want to pay slave wages people cant make it on that and if you think they can take out your pen and write down some numbers on bare bones living.take $10.00 per hr job 1,600.00 before taxes and see how far it goes .....you will wonder how they survive.....BAD THOUGHTS GOT TO GO........

    -- Posted by lamont on Mon, May 30, 2011, at 1:14 PM
  • What about your Grand Kids Zook if they choose to live in Mountain Home after they are finished with school what job will they get?

    Your always talking about the future of your Grand Kids well what kind of future will be here for them?

    The cost of living has gone up zook since when you worked in Boise.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, May 30, 2011, at 1:50 PM
  • The only reason we stayed here is because Pat had the job out on base. After he retired we still had our Grandson to finish raising. I did not want to move him to a different town, and now that he is raised we can't move because we can't sell our houses. If the market ever comes back up and we can sell we will be moving because I don't want to die in the desert. lol !

    Actually Zook we don't need to get any bigger then to fill up the empty houses and business stores downtown. I'd be happy with that.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, May 30, 2011, at 3:15 PM
  • We bought some new carpeting for the rental last year and it was very reasonable and holding up very well. Bought it at cost less carpet and while there I asked about the little girl that does the commmercials. :) We also bought here but when we need to do it again I will go back to Boise.

    I think I seen a for sale sign near the corner at star dust plaza. I figured their trying to sell the whole enchilada. I can remember when I first moved here they were in the progress of building it.

    It's really scary when you see all the empty houses and business's.

    I've had a business license since 04 and thought about opening a business downtown but the over head scares me to much and now wouldn't be a good time so I will just keep selling on the internet.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, May 30, 2011, at 8:39 PM
  • When i did remodels one of the things that bothered me is i thought that people here charged way to much for what they did.It was like they felt they had a captured audience so they could do as they pleased.That kinda thinking will kill your business.A fair price will keep you working.

    THE CARPET THING IS EASY,they cant compete with home depot or boise because boise buys in such bulk and they have contractors to lay the stuff at a set price per house based on rms not yds.That is all they do,and they do it well.They did a house for me last yr in a day, whole house tear out and install 1 day,cant beat that, 3 guys.Now remember they dont fix anything,floor bad or squeak tough.But the price is right.The installers are subs,own equip,trans etc.

    BERMINSOLOS HEIRS WANTED BOISE RENT WE DONT HAVE BOISE TRAFFIC. THEY WOULD NOT BACK OFF.

    THAT IS WHY THEY ARE MOVING OUT.HATE TO SEE IT BUT THEY CREATED THAT SCENARIO.

    I will not vote for that community,I sat on the IMPACT FEES steering committee for awhile and some things came to light,the biggest is we dont have the WATER.and the study that have been done are marginal at best.This is about some spectulators wanting to make as they see it a killing.There are some constructors who see it as a boom, MAYBE for awhile but it is not sustainable.

    There is to much inferstructure required water plants,sewer plants,runoff management,electrical power that will impact the surrounding area to include us.That is not a viable project and it will do nothing positive for us.It's easier to shop in boise than here from there,entertainment etc, I say NO.

    The illegal thing is being addressed,additional people,fence ,enforcement and deportation,and its starting to have and affect.Understanding false papers, the system for status verification should be used.Employers that dont should be fined as i stated before.No jobes they wont come.I dont want to get into the party line I think it is counter productive,and both parties have there crosses to bear.

    I have never supported large scale growth,what i do support is and economy that allows our town to be productive,have a strong taxe base,and be able to employ our people and that can be done without being meridian,caldwell,nampa.I HAVE ALWAYS EQUATED OUR TOWN TO A PLANTATION,JUST ENOUGH TO SURVIVE BUT NOT ENOUGH TO MOVE OFF. THAT is based on MONEY.

    WE went through a major housing downturn in the 80's we slowed down it caught up but we didnt learn we turned around and did the same thing again and we are in it now.PLUS we have people financing homes again to 125 % that doesnt make sense,oh well...........

    I HOPE SOME PEOPLE READ THE ARTICULE IN THE STATESMAN.............

    -- Posted by lamont on Mon, May 30, 2011, at 10:06 PM
  • ZOOK.....THEY HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IT SINCE LAST WEEK.....Wall st is up to it's old self i said it the other day.record profits in a recession especially with the hi percentage of forclosures....The attorney gen in N.Y.OPENED AND INVESTIGATION ON THEM 2 WEEKS AGO.

    I wish we could just pay attention to us and let everything else go but i know we cant.HOW ABOUT KARZI WARNING US.....I SAY OK !!!!!!!!! WE WILL BE GONE NEXT WEEK AND START PACKING.ANYTHING WE CANT HAUL OUT DESTROY AND COME HOME.END IT NOW!!!!!!!!! IF THEY WANT ANYTHING LET THEM PAY FOR IT..........ENOUGH

    -- Posted by lamont on Tue, May 31, 2011, at 11:06 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: