*
Kim's Comments
Kim Kovac

It's the Oct 8tn List

Posted Thursday, October 8, 2009, at 8:25 AM
Comments
View 16 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I dont agree with the latest health care proposals but Heritage Foundation is a questionable. They are so biased that its almost laughable. Numbers can be twisted to prove anybody's case.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Thu, Oct 8, 2009, at 10:20 AM
  • Oh and FOX too. They use studies performed by Heritage Foundation to back up the various hosts agenda.

    For example, one study performed by them states the cost of the Waxman-Markey bill is 9.04 Trillion at the low end and 12.36 Trillion at the high end. This uses the assumption of a baseline year to compare to. This baseline year is 2005. They assume that nothing is going to change from then until 2050. The only change will be higher energy prices and the resulting mess that comes from that. To argue that the only change in everyday life will be energy prices and that we will act exactly the same in 2050 as we did in 2005 is laughable.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Thu, Oct 8, 2009, at 4:42 PM
  • What nobody is worried about #9 or #10? Okay, fine! I guess I'm on my own there. No, strike that phrase. Goin it alone may be thought to be a comment related to the one about masturbation so I can never use that line again without giggling. On a serious note, Censored, I am sorry if you have been sick and I never intended to make anyone think that I doubt that the Swine flu exists. My comment was to question if this flu is any more dangerous than the other normal flu. Nobody seems to have gotten all up in arms about the normal flu and it has killed far more than this H1N1 flu. I hope that you are feeling better, Censored.

    Twil- I have said many times before that numbers are not believable so I stand with you on that one.

    -- Posted by kimkovac on Fri, Oct 9, 2009, at 12:32 AM
  • *

    **** dirty apes, and their crazy apocalyptic ideas.

    I appreciate your concern Kim. But I just learned that my swine flu was just a figment of my imagination. I wasn't really puking, coughing or feverish, I'm just a really good actor. So good that I even tricked myself into believing. Here's the link:

    http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=23035672&blogId...

    -- Posted by censored on Fri, Oct 9, 2009, at 8:47 AM
  • *

    The government pigeon-holed that last link. This one should work.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV9lC0u24Ik&feature=related

    -- Posted by censored on Fri, Oct 9, 2009, at 8:58 AM
  • If I want good solid numbers, I go to Bureau of Labor Statistics, Congressional Budget Office, Census, or Bureau of Economic Analysis. True, it takes awhile for these groups to come up with the numbers. By the time that they have analyzed the issue properly, the issue may be off the table or no one cares anymore. The paradox that is research.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Fri, Oct 9, 2009, at 9:09 AM
  • #9

    Where is Chuck Heston when you need him.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31QUOUxqz2M

    In order to be fair and balanced:.....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9MxTRspXpQ&feature=related

    -- Posted by Beau on Fri, Oct 9, 2009, at 9:41 AM
  • *

    Awesome!

    How can you argue with that kind of proof? I mean the Video evidence is damning! I always knew in my gut that Repubs hated women that talk and do anything other then look pretty. But there's the proof of their sexism in pure technicolor. They blew up lady liberty and created a race of mute women! You people make me sick!

    My God! The implications of such a thing boggles the mind.

    Thank You Beau.

    -- Posted by censored on Fri, Oct 9, 2009, at 10:31 AM
  • *

    Your going to give yourself a heart-attack with all those exclamation points. Just calm down and be cool, otherwise you might not make it for the revolution.

    You should be out hunting and warming up your trigger finger. It's still legal too shoot a deer and curse it liberally.

    Example: I'm gonna fill ya full of lead you *^&$ sucking Liberal! Or, die you dirty fascist!

    It's good therapy and you won't get thrown in jail. Unless you don't have a deer tag.

    -- Posted by censored on Fri, Oct 9, 2009, at 2:48 PM
  • I might try my hand at hunting a deer next year. Any suggestions on a brand or type of rifle. I have not fired a gun of any kind in about 10 years. Its weird how things that are boring and only for "old" people are not so bad when you get older yourself.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Fri, Oct 16, 2009, at 11:02 AM
  • Its kind of ironic that now that my dad is on his last leg due to lung failure from many long years of smoking that now I am starting to get the itch to hunt and fish.

    Not to get off on a tangent but some leftists depict hunters as archaic, conservative, out-of-teach with reality relics. 99% of most hunters that I have met are better environmentalists than the granolas that are made famous with their advocacy.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Sat, Oct 17, 2009, at 12:17 AM
  • I agree about hunters. They have more incentive to maintain the public lands and so most act accordingly. The real threat to them is the yuppie that wants to be an outdoorsman. They desire paved roads, cell phone service, indoor plumbing/sewer, and up-to-date lodging. The modern, middle-class, city folk that have no business being in the wilderness but feel that they must do because everyone else is are the primary offenders. In my experience having spent many summers in Shoup, Idaho they are the ones who leave trash behind and degrade the land.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Mon, Oct 19, 2009, at 10:50 AM
  • Not all places have to be developed. Just leaving some places alone and letting them be remote is the best thing that us humans can do sometimes.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Mon, Oct 19, 2009, at 2:45 PM
  • I have had the same thoughts myself. The closest that I have been to that ideal is the Frank Church Wilderness. I am glad that they did not complete that Forest Service road from Shoup to Riggins.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Tue, Oct 20, 2009, at 8:27 AM
  • "And they know all about what happens when you don't control immigration!"

    This would make for a great bumper sticker. I would find it amusing. I dont know about anyone else but it would give a new light on the subject.

    The residents of Lemhi County are always stereotypes as being old-fashioned, isolationist rednecks that dont have a clue. They make the prospect of development a bit more rigorous than others. The result is miles of pristine, uninhabited, trash-free, unpolluted earth. Not everybody has to line up for tourist dollars.

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Tue, Oct 20, 2009, at 5:26 PM
  • Another example is that of Banff National Park. I know it is Canada but it is not filled with modern infrastructure. Paved roads, yes but there is not a lodge or resort every 3 miles. Beyond the park, the same holds true. The point is that leaving nature be is not a bad thing. It does not mean that one is ignorant and is foresaking income in the name of pride. Making development difficult or sometimes impossible does not mean that one is backwards. Instead of giving into outsiders and adjusting to their wants and desires, why not make them adjust to your ways (albeit simple and old-fashioned).

    -- Posted by twilcox1978 on Fri, Oct 23, 2009, at 3:01 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: