*
Kim's Comments
Kim Kovac

What would you chose?

Posted Tuesday, February 17, 2009, at 9:27 PM
Comments
View 17 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    Well, if you think it's a bribe, then I suppose you will be returning your $52.00 a month because that just wouldn't be ethical, would it?

    -- Posted by LongTimeListener on Tue, Feb 17, 2009, at 9:33 PM
  • Yes, it will all go back in taxes, plus more. I'm so glad you figured that out. Too bad that's all you got from what I wrote. Have a happy time with your 50 bucks.

    -- Posted by kimkovac on Tue, Feb 17, 2009, at 10:54 PM
  • Welcome to the wall...begin to beat your head now. Great blog Kim. Some of us "get" it. Have a great week. I hope you and Ken had a nice Valentine's day.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Tue, Feb 17, 2009, at 11:18 PM
  • Welcome to the wall...begin to beat your head now. Great blog Kim. Some of us "get" it. Have a great week. I hope you and Ken had a nice Valentine's day.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Tue, Feb 17, 2009, at 11:18 PM
  • *

    Evening Kim,

    Found this interesting article on www.gunowners.org Since we're all getting about $50 bucks a month I wanted all the informed people out there know MILLIONS of YOUR tax dollars are going. Nice to know Obama is protecting his own in the pork bill.

    Monday, February 2, 2009

    The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), the far left anti-gun group under investigation for voter fraud, could be eligible to receive millions, if not billions of dollars from the economic bailout bill that passed out of the House of Representatives yesterday.

    ACORN was an aggressive supporter of Barack Obama -- who had served as the group's legal counsel and even trained ACORN in "community organizing" -- in the presidential election. The Obama campaign even paid the group $800,000 for "voter turnout," the very activities that came under scrutiny by the FBI.

    In October 2008, ACORN's Las Vegas office was raided by law enforcement agents investigating voter registration fraud. According to the Nevada Secretary of State's office, voter information submitted by the group included nonexistent names, false addresses, duplicate filings and even the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys.

    In addition to turning in massive amounts of fraudulent voter registration forms leading up to the 2008 elections, ACORN is also involved in anti-Second Amendment activism. For instance, a New Jersey ACORN chapter supported a one-gun-a-month ordinance in Jersey City, a law that was struck down last year by an appeals court for violating the State's preemption law.

    This group should not be eligible to receive one penny of your tax money, yet ACORN has received over $28 million in taxpayer dollars in 2008 alone and over $53 million since 1994. Last year, some members of Congress were able to strip ACORN money from the home mortgage industry bailout bill, but it was reinserted into the current legislation.

    The total amount of money for which groups like ACORN would be eligible in the bill is $4.2 billion, under a provision for "neighborhood stabilization activities." According to the bill, the money can be utilized by state and local governments and also "nonprofit entities or consortia of nonprofit entities."

    ACORN can possibly collect more money under this legislation that it has over the past 15 years, and you can bet that ACORN is expert at accessing those funds.

    Another group that could benefit from the bailout bill is MoveOn.org, an organization that has advocated for sweeping gun control laws.

    According to Rep. Darrell Issa, a California Republican, "MoveOn.org's civic action committee could receive stimulus funds such as money earmarked for energy 'activities', since MoveOn.org lists one of its goals to 'reduce America's dependence on oil.'"

    Pro-gun Senator David Vitter (R-LA) sees the bill as "payoff" for the liberal interest groups that helped to put Barack Obama in the White House, and that some provisions in the bill were actually written with specific interest groups in view.

    Sen. Vitter told FOX News that the bill "is a payoff for that political activity in last year's election, particularly with the fraudulent voter registration drives," Sen. Vitter said.

    The bottom line is that the only thing this bill will "stimulate" is attacks against your gun rights by leftist anti-gun groups. Supporters of the Second Amendment must take action now to see that such funding provisions are stripped from the misnamed stimulus package.

    The bailout measure passed out of the House of Representatives by a vote of 244-188 and now heads to the Senate, where Senators have been working on their own version of the bill.

    Senator [insert] plans to offer an amendment to strip provisions that would fund anti-gun groups like ACORN. Without such an amendment, GOA urges the Senate to reject the bill in its entirety.

    -- Posted by mhbouncer on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 12:34 AM
  • Regardless I am still going to take that $52.00 and put it towards taking care of my family, I have also dropped down my cell phone plan, raised my deductubale on our car insurance and am going to lower my satelite service. I understand the governments plan my fail but there is a chance it will work. It took many years to get us in this trouble and it is going to take many years to get us out, some will work and some will not but all have agreed that standing by and doing nothing is the worse plan. I don't know what the correct plan but right now this is the plan they are trying so I am going to take that 13.00 a paycheck and use if for my family. If in the long run the floor caves in I will have to deal with that.

    -- Posted by small town on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 10:39 AM
  • I think anyone who is so against this plan should not participate in it. Idaho is one state that voted no for this plan yet they are going to gladly take the money from it. According the channel 7 it could produce up to 18,000 jobs here. In anther state as soon as the package was signed a check was given to a contractor to start the repair of a bridge, that brought money to the contractors company and allowed him to hire 30 people, that is 30 less people on unemployment. There is always going to be waste in government spending but there is alot that could come from this plan, it is going to cost a lot to get this country back to where we should be but that is everyones fault, we spent more than we made so now we have to make it right.

    -- Posted by small town on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 10:48 AM
  • *

    It took 25 years for the country to recover from the Great Depression. Nothing happens overnight.

    PS Kim,

    I apologize about the snarky remark I made. There was no need for that. My $13.00 a week will go back in the taxes that will be increased on my liquor.

    -- Posted by LongTimeListener on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 11:15 AM
  • small town,

    I, like many others, do not believe that the government should provide for my family. Likewise, I do not believe the government should tell me what I want or need. This is the point that is being made here, we are free to determine what is right for our family and do our best to provide. I have the ability to be the provider so I do not need the 12 bucks a week that this plan will bring. I will get it because I was not given a choice, the government knows what is good for me.

    On the same line, businesses should be able to provide for themselves. Those who do will survive and prosper. Those who do not will fail. It is just a fact of life, survival of the fittest. If a lousy business is floudering and the government bails them out, what do you have? A lousy business with more more of my money to waste. The weak will stay weak and continue to provide inferior/unaffordable products and services. Time will tell how this pans out.

    -- Posted by jtrotter on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 11:15 AM
  • Jtrotter,

    If you dont need the government to provide for your family, don't drive on the roads paid for by the government, don't accept your mortgage, or shop in any store that may have gotten a government grant, don't allow the military to keep you safe, don't call the police or the fire department when something goes wrong, don't file unemployment if you lose your job or take advantage of any of the government programs. Like it or not we do need the government to help provide for our families.

    -- Posted by small town on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 11:24 AM
  • All of the things you have listed are paid for by our, mine and your, taxes. I work and I pay my fair share. I am allowed to use what I pay for. Unemployment is paid for by all employers. The program is administered by the state with our state tax dollars.

    My father served in the military for 24 years, I proudly served in the military for 22 years, my son is currently serving his country with the Army. Please know your audiance before you blindly make comments.

    I have what I have earned.

    -- Posted by jtrotter on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 1:05 PM
  • You may have earned what you get but it was provided by the government. The government determines you military pay, determines you taxes, determines what projects get done it may be the state government but it is still government, unemployment is paid the the unemployment tax that the company pays to the government. So your right you paid into it and you earned it but it is still run by the government.

    -- Posted by small town on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 1:13 PM
  • AND PAID FOR BY US---the taxpayer.

    There should be a test before a person is ALLOWED to vote. If only people researched a president as much as they research coupons/sales/EBay, etc. If only...

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 6:02 PM
  • Your right is was paid for by the taxpayer and will continue to always be paid for by the taxpayer. We are all responsible for this mess and it is going to take all of us to fix it.

    A question to everyone against President Obama, what exactly did President Bush or the Republican party do to get us out of this mess. Remember before you bash I am an independent I don't like either party. I just want someone to come up with a solution.

    -- Posted by small town on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 6:09 PM
  • I may be wrong but I don't remember President Bush coming on tv when this crisis first started and presenting a plan on how it could be fixed, I do remeber him saying something about being financially sound. If the republicans have a better plan please let me know where I can read about it, I don't want to hear what is wrong with this plan I want to hear what there plan is and how it differs, please put on here a website that I can go to so that I can hear both sides and can make up my own mind.

    -- Posted by small town on Wed, Feb 18, 2009, at 6:26 PM
  • It took 25 years to get out of the great depression? And we spent our way out? And we believe the government knows what to do with our money better than we do?

    -- Posted by skeeter on Thu, Feb 19, 2009, at 7:44 AM
  • So...I only get an extra $13.00 a week not $400,000 or $12,000,000. I knew this was not going to work out...

    Man! Change I can believe in. Can someone explain when please.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Thu, Feb 19, 2009, at 8:21 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: