*
Robert's Randoms
Robert J. Taylor

Bristol Palin may not be the best choice to promote abstinence blog of the day

Posted Thursday, May 7, 2009, at 6:39 AM
Comments
View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I think she was/is a great choice. She knows what it is like to make choices such as the choice to have sex or not have sex. She was taught "abstinence" but chose another road as many young people do. Parents can tell a child what will happen if they do "A", "B", or "C" but sometimes a young person has to find things out on their own with some of the "hard lessons" being the best lessons. It is a hard way to learn granted, but some kids/young adults really have to learn that way for whatever the reason(s).

    I think Ms. Palin is a good choice for this "position" since she has been there done that. Just my opinion.

    Robert, the petition (to respond to your question) is still going. We plan to turn it in soon and it will be voted on in November. Take care.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Thu, May 7, 2009, at 9:18 AM
  • Who better to give advice than the one who has already gone through it. She would be talking to peers, and not a mother daughter talk where 'mom' is saying 'don't'. She would be a great spokesperson for abstinence. The daddy would be also if he so chose to be an ambassador to the guys; and let them know what the true responsiblities are.You know - how to "man-up".

    -- Posted by midea on Thu, May 7, 2009, at 3:34 PM
  • I agree with Robert. Bristol isn't the best choice. I do not believe Bristol can accurately know and be able to teach about the severe consequences of being a single mother. She has a lot of help. Her life will probably not be as affected by her pregnancy as most teenagers would. She will most likely still go to college and get a decent job. She cannot speak for the single mothers who had to drop out of high school or who finished high school but can't afford college. In that aspect, no, Bristol has not 'been there done that.'

    -- Posted by yoB on Fri, May 8, 2009, at 2:02 PM
  • Yob,

    How can you say she cannot teach about the consequences? You are right that she will have help, from her parents, BUT I would add, most young people would! She will be the one raising the baby and dealing with everything. There are a lot of young mothers out there, teenage mothers who have gone to college and landed a decent job!!!! I think she is a good choice for this, until you have walked in their shoes you don't know do you. Its hard being a young mother, especially if you are in high school or just out of high school. You have to take care of the baby, find time to do your housework, keep up with classes and maybe just maybe you will get a few minutes to relax, but usually not. I hope that she can talk to the young girls and boys and tell them what shes going through and how hard it can and will be. Would you have felt different if they chose someone who has not been in the public eye?

    -- Posted by ME1 on Fri, May 8, 2009, at 5:33 PM
  • I agree that ahe IS a good choice. Afterall, a recovering alcoholic or drug addict are the ones who become the best spokespeople for AA or NA. Right? Why would I listen to someone who would have no idea or real empathy? Okay, I know that I don't have to have cancer to sympathize or try to help but I will never be as effective as one who has gone through it. There are powerful young speakers that have made big mistakes and did the right thing by admitting it and telling others about it. How many lives have been changed by teens who told their horrifying experiences with drunk driving? If you hold fast to the belief that sex should wait and tell others that, then I applaud you. We are human beings perfectly capable of having a strong will against sex. IF that were not the case, then we might as well tell sex offenders that it's not really their fault. Matter of fact, we should have support groups and centers to give them "safe-sex" information cause these feelings they have towards children or raping women are just gonna happen. We might as well accept it and give them the help they need. And teenagers are gonna drink, take drugs and smoke pot. They have no control over it. Just accept it! We might as well have classes to teach them how to do it responsively. Self-control and conscience is what seperates us from animals. Teenagers have shown great abilities to have strong will. Those of us who still believe that the future of young girls is better served by teaching them the virtue of having a strong-will must remain strong. I know that being a woman and mother of two girls, I have always tried to teach them about respect for their bodies and how precious a gift sex is. And I can also tell you that most of the women I have ever met have always expressed regret over past sexual mistakes. Why not use that to help others?

    -- Posted by kimkovac on Sun, May 10, 2009, at 11:56 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: